Tuesday, 29 November 2011

Growth & Innovation Fund Launched

The second phase of the Government's Growth and Innovation Fund (GIF) has been launched. The fund supports businesses in the UK to develop their skills solutions tailored to their own needs, transforming growth in their sector, region or supply chain.

The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS) is providing £34 million during 2012-13, added to an existing budget of £29 million. With matched funding from businesses there will be approximately £60 million available under GIF this year.

There are no minimum or maximum funding levels cited for individual projects. However, the selection criteria include looking at the scale and impact of proposals and how well proposed solutions meet priority needs identified by bidders in their sectoral analysis of what can unlock growth potential. For that reason, applications with a very small value will not generally be accepted. BIS expects most successful proposals to be on a relatively large scale requiring investment greater than £500,000 per annum over a period of approximately two years.

GIF is able to invest in a wide variety of ideas and is actively seeking proposals that:
  • deliver demonstrably employer-led, innovative and future-proofed skills solutions;
  • support the drive to greater ownership of skills by employers;
  • use GIF investment alongside employer investment; and
  • build sustainable skills capacity and infrastructure.
Applications are invited from Sector Skills Councils, Industry Training Boards, formally constituted Sector Bodies, National Skills Academies, Employer Associations, Trade Associations and Professional Bodies in the United Kingdom. Collaborative applications are welcomed from multiple sector organisations. In order to ensure the fund supports businesses in the different ways they work together to secure growth, the programme has also extended its eligibility to apply to local enterprise partnerships.

The first deadline for receipt of applications under the Fund's current phase is 31 January 2012.

Renewable Heat Premium Payment Scheme Launched

The Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) is a new Government initiative providing finance to non-domestic renewable heat generators and producers of biomethane in Great Britain.

Designed to revolutionise the way heat is generated and used, this is the first financial support scheme for renewable heat of its kind. Under the scheme's terms, organisations may to apply for assistance and, if successful, receive payments on a quarterly basis for heat generated over 20 years.

£860 million has been made available from central Government funding to support the RHI over the period 2011-2015.

The following technologies are included in the scheme:
  • Biomass boilers (Including CHP biomass boilers).
  • Solar Thermal.
  • Ground Source Heat Pumps.
  • Water Source Heat Pumps.
  • On-Site Biogas combustion.
  • Deep Geothermal.
  • Energy from Municipal Solid Waste.
  • Injection of biomethane into the grid.
The scheme is being introduced in two phases. In the first phase, long-term tariff support is targeted within the non-domestic sectors, focusing on high energy consumers, including the industrial, business and public sectors. These energy users contribute 38% of the UK's carbon emissions. Under this phase there is also support of approximately £15 million for households through the Renewable Heat Premium Payment.

The second phase of the RHI will see the scheme expanded to include more technologies as well as support for households. Details about the introduction of Phase 2 are expected to be announced in early 2012.

Generators of heat and producers of biomethane that are based in Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) may apply to the RHI, providing they meet the eligibility criteria, at any time. For further information please visit:

Tuesday, 1 November 2011

Low Carbon Construction Conference - Invite

Invitation
Low Carbon Construction : Retrofit and the Green Deal (part of the Norfolk - Constructing the Future Conference) 1st December, Norwich

At the next in the series of events on low carbon construction promoted by UEA’s Low Carbon Innovation Centre (LCIC) and InCrops Enterprise Hub we focus on the retrofit agenda including the Green Deal and an example of a local retrofit project. 

This event forms part of the programme of Norfolk –Constructing the Future Conference taking place from 9.00 until 16:00 (full details here http://www.buildnorfolk.co.uk/events/?eventid=46).

These events are free to attend and will be of interest to those involved in construction.

1st December 9.00 – 16.00, John Innes Conference Centre, Norwich

During the morning of the conference LCIC will be presenting an overview of the Code 6 homes at Trinity Close, Rackheath and LCIC’s associated Embodied Carbon Study.  There will also be an opportunity to learn about the Low Carbon Innovation Fund at one of the breakout sessions taking place during the day.

In the afternoon (13.30 – 15.30) Low carbon construction:Retrofit and the Green Deal

Hear about

·         UEA low carbon construction projects – Ben Binns, Business Innovation Manager,  InCrops Enterprise Hub
·         The Green Deal Appraised – an opportunity? – Martin Ingham, Associate Consultant, Low Carbon Innovation Centre
·         ‘Retrofitting Broadland Housing Association’s Stock-lessons learnt’ – David Daniels, Consultant, Low Carbon Innovation Centre
Registration
To register for the both the low carbon construction event and the Norfolk – Constructing the Future Conference please go to http://www.buildnorfolk.co.uk/ (http://www.buildnorfolk.co.uk/events/?eventid=46) , click on the ‘Events’ tab and book on-line.  Information and booking for the session is in the ‘additional information’ section.

More information available on the InCrops website (http://www.incropsproject.co.uk/events/55)

Friday, 28 October 2011

Feed in Tariffs to be Slashed?

Solar subsidies to be cut by more than half

Government documents prematurely published online reveal feed-in tariff cut will double the payback period for householders - By Adam Vaughen and Fiona Harvey (The Guardian Online, Friday 28th October 2011)
Solar subsidies will be cut by more than half. Photograph: Chris Howes/Wild Places Photograph/Alamy
Solar subsidies will be dramatically cut by more than half, according to government documents that were prematurely published online and quickly taken down.


The cut will almost double the payback period for householders, the document revealed, meaning someone installing £10-12,000 solar panels will only be in credit after 18 years rather than the current 10. The rate will be reduced from 43.3p per kilowatt hour of solar electricity to just 21p, the document revealed, cutting returns from around 7% to 4%.


Although the solar industry said it could bear the cuts, many companies said the reductions would hurt the poorest consumers hardest. Lower income households are more likely to rely on free deals whereby the installer takes the subsidy but the household gets free power – often enough to rescue people from fuel poverty.


While the PDF on the Energy Saving Trust website noted that "these proposals are currently under consultation and are not final", the figure is in line with earlier speculation that the rate will be cut by over half. It also said consumers considering solar should assume the 21p figure is what they will get if they install after 8 December.


Howard Johns, MD of Southern Solar, who spotted the document, tweeted: "It seems that EST know exactly what the outcome of the Fit review already – so much for consultation." Toby Ferenczi, chief technology officer at solar company Engensa, wrote: "This isn't acceptable and will result in massive job losses – don't be fooled."


The official announcement on the slashing of the feed-in tariff rate paid to householders looks set for Monday, with energy secretary Chris Huhne slated to make a statement in parliament, echoing tweets from the climate change minister, Greg Barker.


A Department of Energy and Climate Change (Decc) spokesman said: "We'll be publishing a full consultation on changes to the solar PV tariff changes in parliament on Monday. The Energy Saving Trust inadvertently published a draft of documentation on its website that was neither final nor accurate." However, the figures are line with those disclosed by the Guardian.


The spokesman added that if government took no action now, by 2014-15, Fit payments for solar would be cost consumers £980m annually, adding £26 to electricity bills by 2020. Average electricity bills are estimated to be £512 by 2020.


The government has argued that as the cost of solar power has come down, the subsidies should also be reduced as at present solar companies are absorbing some of the extra profits. Although the payback period has been reduced, the financial return at about 4% a year still beats most bank offerings and other financial investments available to individuals.


Prof Stephen Frankel, who chairs the Wadebridge Renewable Energy Network in Cornwall, which wants to install solar panels for free to local homes, warned the cuts would endanger the project.


"The Fit underpins these installations, and the benefits then flow not to outside speculators but are retained in the area and contribute to our community fund. This fund is available for local projects, as decided democratically by local people. We are now told that the Fit is to be curtailed drastically. If that is true, our efforts to act upon government advice and encouragement will have been for naught."


Daniel Green, of the solar installer HomeSun, said people without the money to invest £10,000 or more upfront in roof panels would be hardest hit, as suppliers would no longer find it worth their while to install solar panels for them.


HomeSun is one of a range of companies fitting solar panels to homes and community buildings for free: the roof-owner gains free energy, and the subsidies are kept by the installer. Proponents of these schemes argue that it helps to rescue people from fuel poverty.


Green said: "In the residential sector, providers of free solar panels are around 50% of installations and they will disappear at anything less than 28p per kWh. This means the less well-off will not be able to benefit from solar."


The news comes a day after the government signalled support for the 25,000 jobs in the fast-growing solar industry. Barker said the government wanted growth in solar panel installations to continue.


"We are determined not just to drive down carbon emissions but to build a successful, thriving, prosperous low-carbon economy," he told a solar power conference in Birmingham.


"I'm personally committed to ensuring that your industry can prosper in the longer term, sustaining green jobs at a critical time for our economy, jobs that people can build a career on [and] that can help drive the recovery."


Johns told the Guardian that the cuts would be a "disaster". "If they go ahead with this, the tariff is way too low, and all the social housing and free solar schemes – which make the feed-in tariffs exciting in terms of fuel poverty – will be destroyed." He added that this was the third government review into solar subsidies this year, saying: "We've invested business in PV [solar photovoltaic panels] and had it sliced up three times in a year. They [the government] have no credibility on this any more."


"You can't do U-turns like this without having to answer for it – it puts the spotlight firmly on the coaliton's green credentials," he said.


Seb Berry, head of public affairs at the UK's largest solar company, Solarcentury, said they would campaign against the proposals:

"Today's leak from the EST confirming the government's intention to more than halve the domestic tariff from 8 December to 21p makes a mockery of the feed-in tariff consultation process established by the Energy Act. The minister tried to reassure the industry yesterday that he supported this sector and valued our investment, jobs, innovation and rapid growth. Today those reassurances ring hollow."


Juliet Davenport, CEO of utility Good Energy, said: "Clearly we'll have to wait until Decc comes out with the final details on Monday, but if these rumours are true they are very concerning. Feed-in tariffs have been successful at the end of the day because they give households control over their energy supply, insulating themselves from price hikes and reducing their carbon footprint."


But the consultancy PwC argued that the deep fast cuts proposed by government were better then continued uncertainty or the risk of a bubble leading to over capacity in the short term followed by cuts later, which would mean sharper job losses. "A deep and fast cut in UK Feed in Tariffs (FiTs) will be required to protect the UK solar Photovoltaic (PV) industry from stalling or creating a market bubble before any rate changes take effect," the consultancy said in a report on Friday.


On Thursday, Germany, the world's biggest solar-panel market, said it will also cut subsidies for solar photovoltaic power. Rates will be reduced 15 percent from January 2012, the Bundesnetzagentur, the federal grid regulator, announced. Power from panels will earn 17.94 euro cents to 24.43 euro cents a kilowatt-hour, depending on size and location.


Deep cuts to the popular feed-in-tariff have been overseen in recent years, with the German government arguing that economies of scale and improvements in technology are resulting in rapid reductions in the cost of the sector, meaning the industry no longer needs such a high level state aid. Since Germany's Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG) was introduced 11 years ago, providers are guaranteed fixed prices for the electricity they feed into the grid. Like the UK scheme, it is paid for by consumers, adding 3,59 euro cent a kilowatt-hour on energy bills or, according to calculations by The Rheinish-Westphalian Institute for Economic Research (RWI)€ 85,4 billion for the solar built between 2000 and 2010 and ensuing payments.

The Bundesnetzagentur revises the tariff regularly. A 9 percent reduction every year is given by law, but it can be higher depending on actual new installations. "During the last 12 months an additional new capacity of approximately 5.200 megawatts (MW) has been registered. This figure results in a 15 % lower remuneration compared to the actual FiT for systems connected to the grid beginning January 1st, 2012," said Matthias Kurth, President of the federal grit regulator. The rate could have been cut by as much as 24% (the annual cut's ceiling) if a larger amount of solar, 7,500MW, had been added.


In 2010 Germany added a record 7.400 megawatts of solar power, and small green energy firms have become sizeable within just a few years. The renewable industry supports 380,000 jobs in total, 108,000 within the photovoltaic industry alone. "Germany is the global market leader in the renewable energy sector," German Environment Minister Norbert Röttgen stresses repeatedly.


However, German solar cell manufacturers can hardly keep up, now that prices are collapsing and Chinese suppliers are flooding market. "The prices were falling down more rapidly than German manufactures expected. but they will prevail in the long time because of the better quality", Daniel Kluge from the German Renewable Energy Federation said.

Tuesday, 25 October 2011

'Any company that is not looking at carbon is bonkers'


'Any company that is not looking at carbon is bonkers'
Liesel van Ast - Trucost
Backing for mandatory carbon reporting was almost unanimous during a debate today on the UK Government consultation on proposals to require companies to disclose greenhouse gas emissions.
Mike Anderson, Director General of the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, said companies were "bonkers" if they weren't already looking at carbon, as well as their use of water and other resources. Despite business,  investor and public support for rules to make large or listed companies report on carbon, Defra could find it difficult to introduce the rules because of the Government's arbitrary "one in, one out" rule - regulations with an equivalent cost to business would have to be slashed elsewhere to avoid adding to any overall regulatory "burden".
Defra has to make the case for mandatory reporting based on an impact assessment that was widely criticised for over-egging the costs to business of measuring and reporting emissions, and for under-estimating cost savings that could result from carbon management. Colin Baines, Campaigns Adviser at The Co-operative Group, said that the costs of getting data and including it in annual reports were minimal.
It's unclear how the Government would achieve a target to cut economy-wide emissions by 50% from 1990 levels by 2027 unless companies responsible for more than half of the countries emissions measure and report carbon. It's the very least that they will need to do.
"Measuring and reporting is an essential tool," said Andrew Raingold, Executive Director of the Aldersgate Group, which organised the event and backs the option to require all large comanies to report emissions in their annual reports & accounts under the Companies Act 2006. What gets measured, gets managed.
The consultation closed on 5 July, so it should be clear by the autumn whether or not the Government is prepared to essentially do nothing under a voluntary framework, despite the clamour for mandatory carbon reporting to deliver consistent carbon data to investors and a level playing field for business.

Monday, 17 October 2011

Electronic car infrastructure rolls out across the UK

A G-Wiz electric cars being recharged

With public and private charging networks shifting out of first gear, it is still early days for electric car take-up in the UK

Electric car infrastrcture is slowly shifting out of first gear in the UK. After the launches of a Boris-backed recharging network in London (216 points) and a so-called national network from Ecotricity (12) this year, Chargemaster on Wednesday opened what it described as the "UK's first privately funded nationwide electric vehicle" network (around 150).


These new additions join the UK's hundreds of existing public points, designed to alleviate the "chicken and egg" problem for electric cars that I've blogged on. "Range anxiety", the fear of running out of charge in an electric car is, while overegged by the likes of Top Gear, nevertheless a real deterrent to people switching from petrol and diesel cars.


Chargemaster's new network, Polar, should go some way to reduce that fear. It says it'll have 4,000 points by the end of next year, built at the rate of around 300 a month with its partners, Waitrose, NCP and others.

What doesn't look so good – and is often used as a selling point for electric cars – is the money side. Membership of Polar works out at £24.50 a month, and you pay 90p per charge. That seems steep in comparison to Boris Johnson's Source London network, which while limited to the capital for now, costs just £8.33 a month and comes with free charging.


Yet David Martell, the company's chief executive, isn't worried about competition between public and private charging networks, as 160 of the Source bays are operated by Chargemaster. "The idea is to build the infrastructure, regardless of who it's owned by," Martell said. It wins either way.


What's not clear is whether the driver wins either way. These are embryonic days for electric car take-up in the UK, a technology seen as crucial to hitting carbon targets for transport. Yet just 465 electric cars were sold under the government's £5,000 grant in the first quarter of 2011, falling to 215 in the second. The figures for the third quarter have been delayed, the Department for Transport told me.


Charging points aren't everything when it comes to supporting electric cars – most research suggests the majority of charging will be done at home – but there's a clear fracturing of competing charging networks going on here that doesn't benefit the consumer at all. Polar users can use Source London points, but not vice versa. A new scheme launching next month in Manchester with 300 points, by the Manchester Electric Car Company, is unlikely to be linked with other schemes at launch, a spokeswoman said. Expect similar for the numerous other local schemes in the pipeline.


Lessons learned from privatising railways on complicated ticketing and incompatible schemes spring to mind. Given the government is part-funding some of these points via its £30m plugged-in places scheme, it has a responsibility to make sure they're all interoperable too. Until it does, it risks electric cars in the UK never getting into second gear.

This article was written by Adam Vaughan and was published by the Guardian Online on Friday 14th October 2011

Thursday, 29 September 2011

Heating a home on benefits takes more than fuel promises

The Guardian's Edward Lawrence wonders whether proposals by the energy secretary will make a difference to vulnerable people. First published by the Guardian on Thursday 29th September 2011.
Winter fuel payments can help with energy costs. Photograph: G. Bowater/Corbis
Last week Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrat energy secretary, told the party conference that he was determined to get tough with the six biggest energy companies

Although his speech was full of ideas, it was sadly lacking in how these proposals might be put into effect. The Liberal Democrat conference liked what they heard, despite the lack of details.

One of Huhne's proposals – which no doubt will be subject to intense lobbying by the energy companies – was to give Ofgem more regulatory powers. These would involve giving Ofgem in certain circumstances the ability to fine energy companies 10% of their profits.

Sounds sensible doesn't it? The sort of thing no right thinking person could disagree with, given that energy prices have doubled since 2004.

But on closer inspection Chris Huhne resembles King Canute – who famously, so the story goes, had his throne put by the seashore and ordered the waves not to come in. Huhne's words are as futile as Canute's.
The King's courtiers had said he was so great he could command the sea to stop. His gesture was to point out that words, no matter how well intentioned, had no bearing on events that would happen regardless.
Why do I think this? Because when Ofgem found that British Gas was negligent in its customer service, it fined them £2.5million. It was reported in the Wall Street Journal as a stiff fine, and evidence the regulator wasn't toothless. The next day – 28th July 2011 – British Gas posted half year profits of £1.3 billion. Some disparity between the stiff fine and the profits.

This isn't only of academic interest to me, although it does expose the rank hypocrisy of government ministers in their desperate attempts to appear tough, whilst actually leaving business to do as they please.
No doubt energy companies would point out in their defence that they are merely passing on the rising cost of fuel to the consumer.

But to me it is personal, given that I am wholly dependant on benefits which have not risen in line with the fuel charges or the cost of living generally, as anyone on benefits is all too aware. The situation looks likely to get even worse. Given that the country is in the grip of a recession and people are losing their jobs, not only will the Treasury be losing taxation revenue, it will also be having to pay more unemployment benefit.
Her Majesty's customs and excise recently estimated that the amount of tax that was uncollected was £35 billion in 2009 -2010. The situation is further exacerbated by the news that the International Monetary Fund has forecast our gross domestic product to rise by 1.1%. The economy is the nautical equivalent of the Titanic just before it encountered the iceberg.

Obviously there can be no correlation between people on benefits being afraid to heat their homes because of the cost.

The government will no doubt talk up the winter fuel payment as evidence that it is doing everything it can to encourage people to heat their homes.

Everything to help? Each person gets either £100, £200, or £300 depending on their circumstances.
But as someone haemorrhaging cash, living on benefits with many outgoings and precious few incomings, the winter fuel payment is about as much use as a plasticine football. Although if one doused the plasticine football in paraffin it might be a short-lived source of heat ... But then when it burnt itself out you would be left in the cold again – with only the warm words of the government to heat you.